The pitfall with PIT tags: marking freshwater bivalves for translocation induces short-term behavioural costs
Publication Type: |
Journal Article |
Year of Publication: |
2011 |
Authors: |
Conor D. Wilson, Gareth Arnott, Neil Reid, Dai Roberts |
Publication/Journal: |
Animal Behaviour |
Keywords: |
burrowing, captive breeding, ex situ conservation, freshwater mussel, handling, margaritifera margaritifera, monitoring, stress, tagging, translocation |
ISBN: |
0003-3472 |
Abstract:
Tagging animals is frequently employed in ecological studies to monitor individual behaviour, for example postrelease survival and dispersal of captive-bred animals used in conservation programmes. While the majority of studies focus on the efficacy of tags in facilitating the relocation and identification of individuals, few assess the direct effects of tagging in biasing animal behaviour. We used an experimental approach with a control to differentiate the effects of handling and tagging captive-bred juvenile freshwater pearl mussels, Margaritifera margaritifera, prior to release into the wild. Marking individuals with passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags significantly decreased their burrowing rate and, therefore, increased the time taken to burrow into the substrate. This effect was contributed to, in part, by the detrimental impacts of handling, which also significantly affected activity, burrowing ability and the time taken for each individual to emerge and start probing the substrate. Disturbance during handling and tagging may lead to indirect mortality after release by increasing the risk of predation or dislodgement during flooding, thereby potentially compromising any conservation strategy contingent on population supplementation or reintroduction. This is the first study to demonstrate that handling and PIT tagging has a detrimental impact on invertebrate behaviour. Moreover, our results provide useful information that will inform freshwater bivalve conservation strategies.