The effects of prorating risk in the development of life-tables
Publication Type: |
Journal Article |
Year of Publication: |
2001 |
Authors: |
R. Andrew Odum, Brandie R. Smith |
Publication/Journal: |
Zoo Biology |
Publisher: |
Inc., John Wiley & Sons |
Keywords: |
demography, life table, risk, sparks |
ISBN: |
1098-2361 |
Abstract:
Abstract 10.1002/zoo.1028.abs This study used computer models to investigate two different strategies for assessing risk in the development of age-based life-tables from studbook data sets. One methodology is similar to that currently employed in American Zoo and Aquarium Association population management, which prorates animals at risk within age-classes. The other follows the method used in human life-tables that assumes animals are at risk for the entire age-class. This study concludes that prorating risk may invalidate population growth projections by significantly and unequally over-estimating fecundity and mortality rates. This effect is most pronounced in species that have distinct breeding seasons (birth pulse populations), seasonal mortality, and small data sets. Recommendations include using a non-prorated methodology, tabulating life-tables using only completely known age-class data, and combining population parameters for emigrations, releases, and deaths for population growth projections. Zoo Biol 20:279–291, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.