Birth sex ratio in captive mammals: Patterns, biases, and the implications for management and conservation

Publication Type:
Journal Article
Year of Publication:
2000
Authors:
Lisa J. Faust, Steven D. Thompson
Publication/Journal:
Zoo Biology
Publisher:
Inc., John Wiley & Sons
Keywords:
, , , , , ,
ISBN:
1098-2361
Abstract:

Abstract 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2361(2000)19:1<11::AID-ZOO2>3.3.CO;2-M Sex allocation theory predicts that a female should produce the offspring of the sex that most increases her own fitness. For polygynous species, this means that females in superior condition should bias offspring production toward the sex with greater variation in lifetime reproductive success, which is typically males. Captive mammal populations are generally kept in good nutritional condition with low levels of stress, and thus populations of polygynous species might be expected to have birth sex ratios biased toward males. Sex allocation theory also predicts that when competition reduces reproductive success of the mother, she should bias offspring toward whichever sex disperses. These predicted biases would have a large impact on captive breeding programs because unbalanced sex ratios may compromise use of limited space in zoos. We examined 66 species of mammals from three taxonomic orders (primates, ungulates, and carnivores) maintained in North American zoos for evidence of birth sex ratio bias. Contrary to our expectations, we found no evidence of bias toward male births in polygynous populations. We did find evidence that birth sex ratios of primates are male biased and that, within primates, offspring sex was biased toward the naturally dispersing sex. We also found that most species experienced long contiguous periods of at least 7 years with either male- or female-biased sex ratios, owing in part to patterns of dispersal (for primates) and/or to stochastic causes. Population managers must be ready to compensate for significant biases in birth sex ratio based on dispersal and stochasticity. Zoo Biol 19:11–25, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Links:

Back to Resources