Barren diets increase wakeful inactivity in calves

Publication Type:
Journal Article
Year of Publication:
2017
Authors:
Laura E. Webb, Bas Engel, Kees van Reenen, Eddie A. M. Bokkers
Publication/Journal:
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Keywords:
, , , ,
ISBN:
0168-1591
Abstract:

Inactivity is a vastly understudied behavioural category, which may reflect positive or negative affective states in captive or domesticated animals. Increased inactivity in barren-housed animals, in combination with an increased or decreased interest in stimuli, e.g. novel objects, can indicate boredom or apathy. Another theory is that inactivity is an alternative strategy to stereotypies to cope with sub-optimal conditions. The aim of this study was to further our understanding of inactive behaviours and possible associated negative affective states in intensively raised calves fed different diets. In two separate experiments, Holstein-Friesian veal calves (N = 40 + 160) were fed barren or enriched diets: 1) imposed/restricted diet versus free dietary choice (experiment 1); 2) no additional straw versus ad libitum provision of straw (experiment 2); 3) low versus high solid feed provision (experiment 2); 4) bucket versus automated milk dispenser for milk replacer feeding, with high or low solid feed provision (experiment 2). Inactive behaviours, i.e. experiment 1: lie, idle and sleep; experiment 2: lie idle, stand idle, and sleep, were recorded at two ages (experiment 1: 12 and 26 wk; experiment 2: 15 and 24 wk) using instantaneous scan sampling. In experiment 2, latency to touch two novel objects was recorded at 15 and 24 wk. No differences in inactivity were found between calves with a restricted or free choice diet (experiment 1). However, calves fed the more barren diets in experiment 2 showed more lying idle at 24 wk of age, and calves with no ad libitum straw in particular, showed more standing idle at 24 wk of age (P < 0.05). No differences in latency to touch the novel objects were found. Therefore, although barren diets were generally associated with higher levels of inactivity, we found no support that this inactivity reflected boredom or apathy. Only weak associations were found between inactivity and stereotypies, providing only limited support for the idea that these constitute alternative strategies to cope with sub-optimal conditions.

Links:

Back to Resources