Male and Female Aggression: Lessons from Sex, Rank, Age, and Injury in Olive Baboons
Publication Type: |
Journal Article |
Year of Publication: |
2012 |
Authors: |
H.A. MacCormick, D.R. MacNulty, A.L. Bosacker, C. Lehman, A. Bailey, D. Anthony Collins, C. Packer |
Publication/Journal: |
Behavioral Ecology |
Keywords: |
competition, injury, life history, olive baboon, papio anubis, rank |
ISBN: |
1045-2249 1465-7279 |
Abstract:
Aggression is ubiquitous, influencing reproduction through inter- and intraspecific effects in ways that reflect life-history strategies of species. In many social mammals, females remain in their natal group for life, whereas males emigrate and compete for rank in other social groups. Competition for rank is inherently risky. Therefore, it has long been hypothesized that risks of injury depend on an individual’s sex, rank, and age in ways that maximize an individual’s reproductive output. However, studies quantifying such risks have been lacking. We analyzed 20 years of long-term data on wounds among olive baboons (Papio anubis) in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Males received significantly more wounds than female baboons, and both sexes received the most wounds at ages when they competed most intensely for rank. Immature females received more wounds than immature males in their natal groups, and immature females were more likely to be wounded by females than were immature males. Males in their natal group were wounded less often than immigrant males of the same age. The risk of wounding did not depend on rank in females but rose with rank in immigrant males. Lastly, females received significantly more wounds when cycling (not pregnant or lactating). This study is among the first to quantify the risk of injury for competitors of different sexes, ages, and ranks in social groups. Our results support the prediction that individuals target aggression toward present and future competitors and suggest that sexual coercion increases the risk of wounding in cycling females.